Comparing fin intramedullary nailing with standard locked intramedullary nailing in the fixation of humeral shaft fractures

Stephen Adosope Adesina; Olalekan Akeem Anipole; Samuel Uwale Eyesan; Innocent Chiedu Ikem; Akinsola Idowu Akinwumi; Philip Oluyemi Bamigboye; Oluwafemi Oyewole Oyewusi

doi:10.4103/njot.njot_23_20

Users Online: 206

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Year : 2020 \| Volume : 19 \| Issue : 2 \| Page : 59-64

Comparing fin intramedullary nailing with standard locked intramedullary nailing in the fixation of humeral shaft fractures Stephen Adosope Adesina¹, Olalekan Akeem Anipole², Samuel Uwale Eyesan², Innocent Chiedu Ikem³, Akinsola Idowu Akinwumi⁴, Philip Oluyemi Bamigboye⁵, Oluwafemi Oyewole Oyewusi⁶ ¹ Department of Family Medicine, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State and Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria ² Department of Surgery, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State and Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria ³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria ⁴ Department of Family Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria ⁵ Department of Family Medicine, Brighthope Specialist Hospitals Limited, Lagos State, Nigeria ⁶ Department of Family Medicine, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria Correspondence Address: Dr. Olalekan Akeem Anipole Department of Surgery, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State Nigeria Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None DOI: 10.4103/njot.njot_23_20

Background: Standard interlocking intramedullary nailing of the humeral shaft fractures has its attending complications such as difficulty in locking the nail distally and associated nerve injuries. Aim: To compare the rate of fracture healing, functional outcome and complication rate between SIGN standard locked intramedullary nail (SSLIN) and SIGN intramedullary fin nail (SIFN) in the management of humeral shaft fractures. Method: This is a retrospective comparative study comprising of patients who were treated with either SSLIN or SIFN for humeral shaft fractures. They were followed up until full activities of daily living was achieved. Data collected were processed with SPSS. Comparisons were made between the two groups using student t-test for the continuous variables and Chi-square for the categorical variables. Results: Forty-three patients with humeral shaft fracture were included in this study. Thirty-one of them constituted the SSLIN group while 12 of them constituted the SIFN group. At 6 weeks, radiographic evidence of fracture healing was seen in 64.5% and 58.3% of the patients in the SSLIN and SIFN groups respectively and by the third month, 96.8% and 100% of the patients respectively had achieved radiographic evidence of fracture healing. The differences were not significantly different. There was also no significant difference in the findings from the comparative assessment of functional outcomes in both groups. Conclusion: SIFN compared favorably with the SSLIN in terms of rate of fracture healing and resumption of functional activities. SIFN is therefore encouraged to be used for humeral shaft fractures.



[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*

Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED

Search Pubmed for

Search in Google Scholar for

Related articles

Citation Manager

Access Statistics

Reader Comments

Email Alert *

Add to My List *

* Requires registration (Free)

Article Access Statistics

Viewed	2433

Printed	228

Emailed	0

PDF Downloaded	178

Comments	[Add]